<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for This Sporting Life</title>
	<atom:link href="http://thissportinglife.net/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://thissportinglife.net</link>
	<description>Talking about sports. Thinking about other stuff.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 18 Feb 2012 23:18:12 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The sporting soul by David Brooks on Linsanity and the difference between the morality of religion and sports &#124; Ethics for Adversaries</title>
		<link>http://thissportinglife.net/2010/02/13/the-sporting-soul/#comment-627</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[David Brooks on Linsanity and the difference between the morality of religion and sports &#124; Ethics for Adversaries]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 18 Feb 2012 23:18:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thissportinglifeblog.wordpress.com/?p=24#comment-627</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] Brooks, the New York Times&#8216;s supposedly conservative columnist, regularly looks to sports as a way of making sense of our political and popular culture. This week he used the Jeremy Lin [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Brooks, the New York Times&#8216;s supposedly conservative columnist, regularly looks to sports as a way of making sense of our political and popular culture. This week he used the Jeremy Lin [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on What&#8217;s Wrong With Soccer Broadcasting? (Soccer vs American Sports, part 4) by M.Willis (@M_Willis)</title>
		<link>http://thissportinglife.net/2010/07/22/whats-wrong-with-soccer-broadcasting-soccer-vs-american-sports-part-4/#comment-618</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[M.Willis (@M_Willis)]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Jan 2012 14:38:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thissportinglife.net/?p=345#comment-618</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Great analysis of the entire US soccer broadcasting picture.  I share a lot of your thoughts - and wrote a piece specifically about the idea of how US Soccer commentary (from the booth) might evolve in the near future.  http://mwl.li/soccer-madden]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great analysis of the entire US soccer broadcasting picture.  I share a lot of your thoughts &#8211; and wrote a piece specifically about the idea of how US Soccer commentary (from the booth) might evolve in the near future.  <a href="http://mwl.li/soccer-madden" rel="nofollow">http://mwl.li/soccer-madden</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Luck don&#8217;t come easy by Wayne Norman</title>
		<link>http://thissportinglife.net/2011/10/31/luck-dont-come-easy/#comment-588</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Wayne Norman]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 Oct 2011 18:18:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thissportinglife.net/?p=569#comment-588</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Yes, &quot;Suck for Luck&quot; is an interesting perversion of the competition for the Super Bowl ... in some future year. (I take it that it refers to the quest to finish last in the NFL so that you &quot;win&quot; the chance to draft first and take top QB prospect Andrew Luck.) It is perverse enough that some leagues (e.g. the NHL, I think) make a handful of the worst teams enter a lottery for the chance to draft first. Any league&#039;s brass surely get indigestion at the thought of truly embarrassing deliberate attempts to lose games late in the season. For any given team, of course, &quot;sucking for Luck&quot; can be a perfectly rational strategy to maximize their chance of long-term success. But &quot;the game&quot; exists and thrives only if it makes sense and provides entertainment and meaning on all sorts of levels. And part of this drama relies on our believing that these teams and players have integrity, pride, and are professionals (and not simply because they get paid, but in the sense that they are committed to the &quot;point&quot; of their profession, and not merely to the opportunity it gives them to &quot;win&quot;). Some of this may be illusion on the part of fans, but players and teams have to realize that their livelihood -- in the long run -- relies on our being able to maintain such illusions. Herm Edwards, then coach of the then-lowly Jets, understood this when he emphasized, to a roomful of cynical sports reporters, that &quot;WE. PLAY. TO WIN. THE GAME.&quot; Granted, he lost his job soon after that....]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, &#8220;Suck for Luck&#8221; is an interesting perversion of the competition for the Super Bowl &#8230; in some future year. (I take it that it refers to the quest to finish last in the NFL so that you &#8220;win&#8221; the chance to draft first and take top QB prospect Andrew Luck.) It is perverse enough that some leagues (e.g. the NHL, I think) make a handful of the worst teams enter a lottery for the chance to draft first. Any league&#8217;s brass surely get indigestion at the thought of truly embarrassing deliberate attempts to lose games late in the season. For any given team, of course, &#8220;sucking for Luck&#8221; can be a perfectly rational strategy to maximize their chance of long-term success. But &#8220;the game&#8221; exists and thrives only if it makes sense and provides entertainment and meaning on all sorts of levels. And part of this drama relies on our believing that these teams and players have integrity, pride, and are professionals (and not simply because they get paid, but in the sense that they are committed to the &#8220;point&#8221; of their profession, and not merely to the opportunity it gives them to &#8220;win&#8221;). Some of this may be illusion on the part of fans, but players and teams have to realize that their livelihood &#8212; in the long run &#8212; relies on our being able to maintain such illusions. Herm Edwards, then coach of the then-lowly Jets, understood this when he emphasized, to a roomful of cynical sports reporters, that &#8220;WE. PLAY. TO WIN. THE GAME.&#8221; Granted, he lost his job soon after that&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Luck don&#8217;t come easy by saideman</title>
		<link>http://thissportinglife.net/2011/10/31/luck-dont-come-easy/#comment-587</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[saideman]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 Oct 2011 15:55:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thissportinglife.net/?p=569#comment-587</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[With this title, I thought you would be combining this blog with ethics for adversaries and address &quot;Suck for Luck&quot; NFL dynamic.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>With this title, I thought you would be combining this blog with ethics for adversaries and address &#8220;Suck for Luck&#8221; NFL dynamic.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Blurring the lines between sports, business, politics, and media by donna</title>
		<link>http://thissportinglife.net/blurring-the-lines-between-sports-business-politics-and-media/#comment-577</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[donna]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 25 Sep 2011 18:18:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thissportinglife.net/?page_id=559#comment-577</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I like considering sports to be an art of blending business, politics, and media.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I like considering sports to be an art of blending business, politics, and media.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on What&#8217;s Wrong With Soccer Broadcasting? (Soccer vs American Sports, part 4) by Topher</title>
		<link>http://thissportinglife.net/2010/07/22/whats-wrong-with-soccer-broadcasting-soccer-vs-american-sports-part-4/#comment-574</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Topher]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Jul 2011 23:07:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thissportinglife.net/?p=345#comment-574</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[live play coverage of american football is still crap like soccer with the same high mid-field side camera. but its true the pre-play and post play preparings and recaps make the game spectacular because you can know what the players went through if anything before the snap by the movement of cameras around the line especially on the quarterback or perhaps a player who had just made a big play, and on the post-play every camera angle has already beautifully cut-up footage to present perfect understanding of each process that those players involved with the play had gone through, the openings they found the openness in the field the linemans crafty work, the quarterbacks thoughts and hurdles and so on. the quick editing is spectacular along with the announcers knowledge to quickly summulate and relate that footage. i wish the during play coverage would change it up sometimes though i mean maybe camera it from behind the o-line or d-line or maybe at some vertical angles where you can still see the whole line where people wouldnt have the chance of not seeing a player that ended up being crucially involved. just sitting in the endzone bleachers of either side give you perspectives that youve never seen along with the corners of the stadium and going up the stands.

to get back on soccer ive noticed that the WPS does a much better job than any mens league on camera changing and i actually was able to see some live in front of the goal play that ive never seen live in any mens division. i actually witnessed a goal looking right at the goal which was always strictly a replay or recap shot that youd only be able to see after the game or briefly on score edited replay and the WPS seems to take less need on showing the whole field at all times and actually shows close ups and camera changes.
for sure this is because like you said the popular sports go out to many different signals and given that this reasons to stick to the lowest-common-denominator formula. but since the WPS is a lot less widely distributed gives them more room to experiment and explore other possibilities which i think is fascinating

to add two more things about american soccer that ruins it is easy draws, you should have to fight hard to draw a draw is not an easy thing, it goes to say that both teams were so closely matched that an even outcome was the only logical final analysis to be made, but games are never that close and im sorry a game where a team has 15 shots on goal against a team that only has 3 shots but the scores only 2-2 is not an evenly matched game and to prove that the other team does have more possibility they should get a kind of american football overtime in all games but i can agree with leaving the shootouts to elimination games, but give every other game some kind of golden goal overtime and maybe not a split 30 minutes but 15 or 20.

another thing that ruins american soccer and for that all american sports is minor leagues that arent a league really but simply a training camp for the bigs this leads people to sensationalize every top league player because theres not many others to compare and contrast with a sort of monopoly structure forms and the reasons a lot of players make to the top is a lineage of sensationalized traits that they were in the right situation for coaches and scouts who got a hard-on for those traits, where there wasnt a linear progression that demands development in all fields of the sport but more of a culting up of absolutist like qualities.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>live play coverage of american football is still crap like soccer with the same high mid-field side camera. but its true the pre-play and post play preparings and recaps make the game spectacular because you can know what the players went through if anything before the snap by the movement of cameras around the line especially on the quarterback or perhaps a player who had just made a big play, and on the post-play every camera angle has already beautifully cut-up footage to present perfect understanding of each process that those players involved with the play had gone through, the openings they found the openness in the field the linemans crafty work, the quarterbacks thoughts and hurdles and so on. the quick editing is spectacular along with the announcers knowledge to quickly summulate and relate that footage. i wish the during play coverage would change it up sometimes though i mean maybe camera it from behind the o-line or d-line or maybe at some vertical angles where you can still see the whole line where people wouldnt have the chance of not seeing a player that ended up being crucially involved. just sitting in the endzone bleachers of either side give you perspectives that youve never seen along with the corners of the stadium and going up the stands.</p>
<p>to get back on soccer ive noticed that the WPS does a much better job than any mens league on camera changing and i actually was able to see some live in front of the goal play that ive never seen live in any mens division. i actually witnessed a goal looking right at the goal which was always strictly a replay or recap shot that youd only be able to see after the game or briefly on score edited replay and the WPS seems to take less need on showing the whole field at all times and actually shows close ups and camera changes.<br />
for sure this is because like you said the popular sports go out to many different signals and given that this reasons to stick to the lowest-common-denominator formula. but since the WPS is a lot less widely distributed gives them more room to experiment and explore other possibilities which i think is fascinating</p>
<p>to add two more things about american soccer that ruins it is easy draws, you should have to fight hard to draw a draw is not an easy thing, it goes to say that both teams were so closely matched that an even outcome was the only logical final analysis to be made, but games are never that close and im sorry a game where a team has 15 shots on goal against a team that only has 3 shots but the scores only 2-2 is not an evenly matched game and to prove that the other team does have more possibility they should get a kind of american football overtime in all games but i can agree with leaving the shootouts to elimination games, but give every other game some kind of golden goal overtime and maybe not a split 30 minutes but 15 or 20.</p>
<p>another thing that ruins american soccer and for that all american sports is minor leagues that arent a league really but simply a training camp for the bigs this leads people to sensationalize every top league player because theres not many others to compare and contrast with a sort of monopoly structure forms and the reasons a lot of players make to the top is a lineage of sensationalized traits that they were in the right situation for coaches and scouts who got a hard-on for those traits, where there wasnt a linear progression that demands development in all fields of the sport but more of a culting up of absolutist like qualities.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Why Medal Counts Don&#8217;t Really Count by Medals and trophies</title>
		<link>http://thissportinglife.net/2010/03/04/why-olympic-medal-counts-dont-count/#comment-570</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Medals and trophies]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Jun 2011 10:22:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thissportinglife.net/?p=112#comment-570</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[You&#039;re definitely right - there does seem to be some mis-correlation between some sports and the number of medals given out - like they are much more important than others. So, really, there is no real winner - just a bunch of people that are quite good... not one person that&#039;s the best.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You&#8217;re definitely right &#8211; there does seem to be some mis-correlation between some sports and the number of medals given out &#8211; like they are much more important than others. So, really, there is no real winner &#8211; just a bunch of people that are quite good&#8230; not one person that&#8217;s the best.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Still wondering about the Wonderlic test by A friendly chat about adversaries &#124; Ethics for Adversaries</title>
		<link>http://thissportinglife.net/2011/03/26/still-wondering-about-the-wonderlic-test/#comment-555</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[A friendly chat about adversaries &#124; Ethics for Adversaries]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Apr 2011 14:17:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thissportinglife.net/?p=551#comment-555</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] Some of the topics of conversation were plucked from my other blog, This Sporting Life, including one on Why the NCAA Tournament is the American Idol of Sports, and What&#8217;s Wrong with the Wonderlic Test. [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Some of the topics of conversation were plucked from my other blog, This Sporting Life, including one on Why the NCAA Tournament is the American Idol of Sports, and What&#8217;s Wrong with the Wonderlic Test. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Why the NCAA basketball Tournament is the &#8220;American Idol&#8221; of sports by A friendly chat about adversaries &#124; Ethics for Adversaries</title>
		<link>http://thissportinglife.net/2010/04/25/why-the-ncaa-basketball-tournament-is-the-american-idol-of-sports/#comment-554</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[A friendly chat about adversaries &#124; Ethics for Adversaries]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Apr 2011 14:17:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thissportinglife.net/?p=185#comment-554</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] of the topics of conversation were plucked from my other blog, This Sporting Life, including one on Why the NCAA Tournament is the American Idol of Sports, and What&#8217;s Wrong with the Wonderlic [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] of the topics of conversation were plucked from my other blog, This Sporting Life, including one on Why the NCAA Tournament is the American Idol of Sports, and What&#8217;s Wrong with the Wonderlic [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Still wondering about the Wonderlic test by Bryan</title>
		<link>http://thissportinglife.net/2011/03/26/still-wondering-about-the-wonderlic-test/#comment-552</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Bryan]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Apr 2011 12:31:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thissportinglife.net/?p=551#comment-552</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[While I wasn&#039;t completely surprised by the reaction, I had a good laugh at the coverage of Greg McElroy&#039;s Wonderlic test. By scoring a 48 out of 50, some news outlets suggested he&#039;d be dropped from teams&#039; draft boards for being too smart. Only in the NFL...

On the bright side, Ryan Fitzpatrick also scored a 48 and he did OK last season. Granted, it&#039;s taken him a while to get a shot.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>While I wasn&#8217;t completely surprised by the reaction, I had a good laugh at the coverage of Greg McElroy&#8217;s Wonderlic test. By scoring a 48 out of 50, some news outlets suggested he&#8217;d be dropped from teams&#8217; draft boards for being too smart. Only in the NFL&#8230;</p>
<p>On the bright side, Ryan Fitzpatrick also scored a 48 and he did OK last season. Granted, it&#8217;s taken him a while to get a shot.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

